Reasons for | Reasons against |
---|---|
Easy format for stakeholders to grasp the key takeaway without being overwhelmed. | Atomic findings may lack the broader context of a project, which can lead to misinterpretation or an incomplete understanding of the issue. |
Quick and easy share any early findings during analysis process. | Focusing on one finding might oversimplify complex issues, potentially ignoring underlying factors or contributing data from other projects. |
Effective for drawing attention to urgent or critical information. | Stakeholders may selectively use single findings to support their arguments, which can lead to biased decision-making. |
Reasons for | Reasons against |
---|---|
Allows for a deep dive into specific project data, leading to more detailed and actionable insights that are directly relevant to the project’s objectives. | Insights are limited to the context of a single project, which might miss broader trends or opportunities that could be identified across multiple projects. |
Easier to manage and communicate insights within a single project, reducing the complexity and potential for misinterpretation. | Focusing on a single project might lead to underutilization of resources that could be shared across projects. |
With insights tied to a specific project, it is easier to assign responsibility and track progress. | Can lead to siloed thinking, where teams are not aware of or do not benefit from insights gained in other projects. |