Skip to main content
Screenshot2026 02 13at11 24 33AM
Building effective reports in Dovetail starts with knowing where you’re working and what you want to discover. Whether you’re analyzing a single user study, synthesizing feedback across multiple sources, or tracking trends in your support tickets, the right prompt can help you uncover insights faster and share them more effectively. This guide will show you how to create high-quality reports from anywhere in Dovetail—and how to refine your prompts to get exactly the output you need.

How to build a report in Dovetail

You can generate reports from three different entry points in Dovetail, each suited to different workflows and different scopes. Choose the method that fits your current workflow.

From Docs

When you create a Doc directly within a project or folder, Dovetail analyzes all the data in that specific context to generate your report. This method gives you precise control over scope—you’re always working with a defined dataset, whether that’s a single research study or an entire folder of related projects.
  • When to use: Ideal when you know exactly what data you want to analyze and need a polished, standalone report you can refine and share.
  • Available scopes: Project, folder
  • Learn more about creating reports in Docs

From Contextual Chat

Contextual Chat lets you explore your data conversationally and capture insights as they emerge. At any point in your session, you can convert the latest response into a shareable Doc — so it’s easy to preserve discoveries and distribute findings without breaking your flow.
  • When to use: Perfect for exploratory analysis, quick insights, or when you want to iterate on your questions and prompts before finalizing a report.
  • Available scopes: Project, channel, folder

From Agents

Agents automate report generation on a schedule you define. You can configure an Agent to create and send Docs at regular intervals—weekly competitive analysis, monthly voice of customer summaries, or quarterly research digests. Once set up, your reports arrive automatically without manual prompting.
  • When to use: Best for recurring reports, stakeholder updates, tracking how themes and sentiment evolve over time or when you need a refined selection of data sources
  • Available scopes: Project, channel, folder, multiple projects, projects(s) & channel(s)
  • Learn more about creating scheduled reports with Agents

General Guidelines

Great reports start with clear, specific prompts. These eight principles will help you write prompts that generate focused, actionable reports—no matter what context you’re working in.
Good: Create a report analyzing customer onboarding fricton points. Focus on the first 30 days of user experience, identify where users get stuck, and include specific quotes from support tickets.Less Effective: make a report about onboarding
Good: Create a product requirements document with these section:
  1. Overview of the feature
  2. Customer pain points we’re solving
  3. Functional requirements
  4. Acceptance criteria
  5. Technical constraints
Focus on mobile checkout improvements based on our user interviews.Less Effective: write a PRD for checkout
Good: Analyze customer feedback from Q4 2024 interviews about our pricing model.  Focus on enterprise customers (50+ employees) and identify:
  • What they value most
  • Pricing concerns
  • Comparison to competitors
  • Willingness to pay for premium features
Good: Create a voice of customer report that:
  • Summarizes overall sentiment (positive/negative/neutral)
  • Identifies top 5 themes with customer quotes
  • Highlights opportunities and risks
  • Focuses on feedback from the last 3 months
Good: Write a comprehensive research report that goes deep into each finding.  For each section, include:
  • Detailed analysis (2-3 paragraphs)
  • Multiple supporting quotes (3-5 per point)
  • Specific examples from the data
  • Actionable recommendations
If using contextual chat, you can build up your requirements across multiple messages.
  • Message 1: I want to create a report on user onboarding issues
  • Message 2 (after seeing initial results): Focus specifically on the mobile app onboarding flow, not the web version
  • Message 3: Add a section comparing our onboarding to competitors mentioned in the interviews
Good: Create a report with:
  • Level 1 headers for main sections
  • Level 2 headers for subsections
  • Bullet points for key findings
  • Block quotes for customer quotes
  • Keep paragraphs concise (1-2 sentences)
Tips to Remember
  1. Be specific about scope and focus areas
  2. Request the structure you want (sections, depth, format)
  3. Use multi-turn conversations to refine requirements
  4. Specify what to include and exclude
  5. Guide the analysis depth (high-level vs detailed)
  6. Mention the audience/tone if relevant
Things to Avoid
  • Vague requests: “Make a report”
  • Too many conflicting instructions in one message
  • Asking for information not in your data
  • Overly complex nested requirements that confuse the structure

Custom Prompt Example

Create a comprehensive product requirements document for a new mobile checkout featureThe document should include:
  1. Overview: Brief description of the feature and strategic alignment
  2. Customer insights: Key findings from our user interviews about checkout abandonment, with specific quotes
  3. Problem statement: Current state vs desired state
  4. Requirements: Functional requirements organized by priority (must-have, should-have, nice-to-have)
  5. Acceptance criteria: SMART criteria for each requirement
  6. Technical considerations: Constraints and dependencies
Focus on:
  • Mobile app users only (exclude web)
  • Checkout flow from cart to payment confirmation
  • Pain points mentioned in interviews from the last quarter
  • Include at least 3-5 customer quotes per major finding
Write in a professional tone suitable for product and engineering teams.

Guidelines by Context Scope

The scope of your data—whether it’s a single project, an entire folder, or a combination of sources—shapes how you should structure your prompts and which tool you will use. Each context type requires different strategies for organizing findings, attributing sources, and synthesizing insights.

Available tools by Context Scope

DocsContextual ChatAgents
Project level
Folder level
Channel level
Multiple projects
Project(s) + Channel(s)

Project level

When working within a single project, you have a cohesive dataset. Your prompts should help Dovetail go deep on themes, trace patterns across interviews or observations, and build a narrative that stays true to that single project. You can create reports from a project using:
  • Contextual Chat – Start a chat within the project, ask your questions, and convert any response into a Doc
  • Docs – Create a new Doc directly in the project to generate a report from all data in that context
  • Agents – Set up an automated Agent to generate and send reports on a schedule
How to refine your prompts
Create a report that aligns with this project’s goals (see project overview). Structure the report around the project’s main questions or objectives. Prioritize findings that speak directly to those goals.
Create a detailed research report from this project
  • Go deep on each theme (longer analysis, more quotes)
  • Trace patterns across multiple notes or interviews
  • Call out nuance and contradictions
For interview/ qualitative projects
  • Create a report organized by:
    • Key themes (not by individual interview)
    • Supporting quotes from multiple participants per theme
    • Participant diversity (e.g., roles, segments) when it adds meaning
    • Clear problem statement and recommendations grounded in this project
For usability/ task-based projects
  • Create a report organized by task or by research question. For each:
    • What we asked / what people did
    • Main findings and patterns
    • Representative quotes
    • Severity or impact where relevant
For mixed / general projects
  • Create a report that synthesizes all notes and Docs in this project into 5–7 themes. For each theme: summary, evidence from the project, and 2–4 quotes. End with clear implications and next steps for this project.
Create a report from this project, focusing on:
  • Interviews where segment = Enterprise segment
  • Data from the last 6 months
Project-Level Prompt Example
Create a report for this project focused on participants, where segment = Enterprise, and data from the last 6 months. Organize findings into 4–6 themes, include 2–3 quotes per theme from different participants, and call out where Enterprise feedback differs from other segments.

Channel level

Channels contain ongoing streams of feedback—support tickets, app reviews, community messages. Your prompts should guide Dovetail to identify volume-based patterns, track sentiment over time, and surface both frequent issues and emerging themes. You can create reports from a channel using:
  • Contextual Chat – Start a chat within the channel, ask your questions, and convert any response into a Doc
  • Agents – Set up an automated Agent to generate and send reports on a schedule
How to refine your prompts
Create a report organized by themes from the Support Tickets channel:
  • For each major theme:
    • Summarize the theme’s core issue
    • Include 3-5 representative datapoint quotes
    • Note sentiment patterns (positive/negative/neutral)
    • Identify volume trends (increasing/decreasing)
    • Highlight any sub-themes or related patterns
Create a voice of customer report from the App Store Reviews channel that includes
  • Overall sentiment breakdown (positive/negative/neutral percentages)
  • Sentiment trends over time
  • Themes with the most negative sentiment
  • Themes with positive sentiment (what users love)
  • Sentiment shifts and what might have caused them
Create a report that analyzes:
  • Volume-based patterns: High-frequency issues mentioned across many datapoints
  • Insight-based patterns: Deeper themes that emerge from analyzing multiple datapoints together
  • Trend analysis: How themes have changed over time (last 3 months vs previous period)
Note when findings are volume-driven (many mentions) vs insight-driven (emerging patterns).
Create a report analyzing feedback from the App Store Reviews channel for Q4 2025 (October-December). Compare findings to Q3 2025 to identify:
  • New themes that emerged
  • Themes that increased in volume
  • Themes that decreased
  • Sentiment changes over time
Create a report that:
  1. Identifies the top 5-7 themes by volume
  2. Synthesizes related themes into broader categories
  3. Highlights emerging themes (new or growing)
  4. Notes declining themes (less frequent mentions)
  5. Includes representative quotes from each major theme
Channel Level Prompt Examples
What new or emerging themes have appeared in this channel in the last 2 weeks? Include a few representative examples for each.List the top 10 themes in this channel from the last 30 days. For each, include frequency, severity/impact (high/medium/low), and a suggested next step.Summarize the most actionable feedback in this channel from the last 14 days. Focus on bugs, blockers, and recurring confusion. Include examples and recommended owners (Product, Support, or Engineering).

Folder level

Folders can contain multiple projects and represent a broader body of data. The key decision here is whether to treat everything as one unified corpus or to preserve the structure of sub-folders and individual projects. Your prompt should make this organizational choice explicit. You can create reports from a folder using:
  • Contextual Chat – Start a chat within the folder, ask your questions, and convert any response into a Doc
  • Docs – Create a new Doc directly in the folder to generate a report from all data in that context
  • Agents – Set up an automated Agent to generate and send reports on a schedule
How to refine your prompts
Option A: one corpus (treat all folder data as one set and organize by themes)Create a report that treats all data in this folder as one research corpus. Organize by themes and patterns across the whole folder. Don’t structure the report by sub-folder or project—synthesize everything into unified themes.Option B: by-sub folder (respect the folder structure)Create a report organized by sub-folder:
  1. [Sub-folder A] – themes and findings from projects in this sub-folder
  2. [Sub-folder B] – themes and findings from projects here
  3. [Sub-folder C] – same
  4. Cross-folder themes – patterns that show up in multiple sub-folders
Option C: by project (call out projects when it helps)Create a report that:
  • Synthesizes themes across the whole folder
  • When a theme is mostly from one or two projects, name those projects
  • For cross-cutting themes, note which projects they appear in
  • Use project names from the folder structure to add clarity
Create a voice of customer report from the “Customer Feedback” folder. This folder holds all our feedback-related projects (interviews, usability studies, surveys). Synthesize into one view of customer sentiment and priorities, organized by theme, not by individual project.
This folder contains:
  • User interview projects
  • Usability test projects
  • Survey analysis projects
Create a report that combines these sources into one set of product requirements, and note which type of research (interview vs usability vs survey) each finding comes from when it’s relevant.
Create a report that:
  • Synthesizes findings across all projects in this folder
  • Highlights themes that appear in multiple projects (cross-project validation)
  • Flags findings that appear in only one project (may need more research)
  • Uses project diversity as a strength (different methods, segments, time periods)
Folder Level Prompt Example
Create a report organized by sub-folder. For each sub-folder, summarize key themes and include supporting quotes. End with a “Cross-folder themes” section that highlights patterns across multiple sub-folders

Multiple projects

When you select specific projects to analyze together, you’re looking for cross-project patterns while preserving the unique context of each study. Your prompts should guide whether to synthesize into unified themes, compare findings across projects, or both. You can create reports from multiple chosen projects using:
  • Agents – Set up an automated Agent that analyzes your selected projects and sends reports on a schedule
How to refine your prompts
Option A: Cross-project synthesis (unified themes)Create a report that synthesizes findings across all projects into unifiedthemes. Don’t organize by project - instead, identify patterns that appear across multiple projects and group findings by theme (e.g., “Technical barriers”, “Support gaps”, “User expectations”). For each theme, include quotes from multiple projects to show breadth.Option B: Project specific sectionsCreate a report organized by project:
  1. Mobile App Onboarding - findings specific to mobile
  2. Web Platform Onboarding - findings specific to web
  3. Enterprise Customer Onboarding - findings specific to enterprise
  4. Cross-project patterns - themes that appear across all projects
Option C: hybrid approachCreate a report with:
  1. Unified themes section - common patterns across all projects
  2. Project-specific insights section - unique findings per project
  3. Comparative analysis - how findings differ between projects
Create a report comparing customer feedback across:
  • Project A: Mobile App
  • Project B: Web Platform
  • Project C: Enterprise Portal
For each major theme, compare:
  • How frequently it appears in each project
  • Severity differences between projects
  • Project-specific nuances
  • Overall patterns that transcend individual projects
When including quotes, indicate which project they came from when relevant. For cross-project themes, include quotes from multiple projects to show consistency. For project-specific findings, clearly attribute quotes to their source project.
Create a report analyzing pricing feedback across:
  • SMB Customer Interviews (Project A)
  • Enterprise Sales Calls (Project B)
  • Mid-Market Surveys (Project C)
Account for the different contexts (interview vs sales call vs survey) when synthesizing findings. Note where findings are context-specific vs universal across all project types.
Create a report from these projects, prioritizing findings from:
  • Primary: Enterprise Customer Research (most important)
  • Secondary: SMB Customer Interviews (supporting)
  • Tertiary: User Surveys (additional context)
Weight the analysis accordingly - spend more detail on Enterprise findings but include SMB and Survey data to provide broader context.
Multi-project Prompt Example
Create a report from the selected projects that combines synthesis and comparison:
  • Start with 5–7 themes that appear across multiple projects. Rank themes by strength (how consistently they show up across projects).
  • For each theme, include 2–3 supporting quotes and label each quote with the project name.
  • Add a section called “Project-by-project differences” that highlights what’s unique or contradictory in each project (and why that context matters).
  • Weight findings toward Project A and Project B, and treat the remaining projects as supporting evidence unless they strongly disagree.
Conclude with 3–5 recommendations reflecting the highest-confidence cross-project patterns, plus 3 open questions to validate next.

Combination of project(s) and channel(s)

Combining structured data (projects) with unstructured feedback streams (channels) gives you both depth and breadth. Your prompts should help Dovetail balance these different data types—using interviews for deep insights and channels for volume validation. You can create reports from a combination of projects and channels using:
  • Agents – Set up an automated Agent that analyzes your selected projects and channels, then sends reports on a schedule
How to refine your prompts
Create a report that synthesizes:Structured research data (from projects):
  • Deep insights from user interviews
  • Detailed findings from research studies
  • Context-rich quotes from transcripts
Unstructured feedback data (from channels):
  • Quick feedback from App Store reviews
  • Support ticket pain points
  • Community discussion snippets
For each theme, combine:
  • Deep insights from project interviews (primary evidence)
  • Supporting feedback from channels (volume/trend validation)
  • Note the source type when relevant (interview vs review vs ticket)
When including quotes, indicate the source type:
  • [Interview] for quotes from project interviews
  • [Review] for quotes from App Store reviews
  • [Support] for quotes from support tickets
  • [Community] for quotes from Slack/community channels
This helps readers understand the context and depth of each finding.
Option A: Unified themes (recommended)Synthesize findings into unified themes that draw from both projects and channels. For each theme:
  • Lead with deep insights from project interviews
  • Support with volume/trends from channel datapoints
  • Show how structured research validates unstructured feedback
  • Include quotes from both sources
Option B: source-type sectionsOrganize the report by data source type:
  1. Structured research findings (from projects)
  2. Unstructured feedback patterns (from channels)
  3. Synthesis - how both sources align or differ
Option C: hybridCreate a report with:
  1. Unified themes section - patterns across all sources
  2. Deep dive sections - detailed findings from project interviews
  3. Volume/trend sections - patterns from channel datapoints
  4. Cross-validation - where project research confirms channel feedback
Create a report that accounts for different data types:Project data (interviews/research):
  • Rich context and detailed insights
  • Use for primary findings and deep analysis
  • Quote longer excerpts when needed
Channel data (reviews/tickets/messages):
  • Shorter, more frequent feedback
  • Use for volume validation and trend identification
  • Quote concise snippets
  • Note when patterns are volume-based vs insight-based
Compare findings across data types:
  • Where do project interviews align with channel feedback?
  • Where do they differ? (e.g., interviews reveal root causes, channels show symptoms)
  • What insights are unique to each source type?
  • How does structured research validate or challenge channel trends?
Example Prompt for Project(s) + Channel(s)
Create a voice of customer report on mobile checkout frictionAnalyze data from:
  • Projects: Mobile Checkout Usability Study, Enterprise Customer Interviews Q4 2024
  • Channels: App Store Reviews, Support Tickets (Product category)
Approach: Synthesize into unified themes. For each theme:
  • Lead with deep insights from project interviews
  • Support with volume/trends from channel feedback
  • Include 3-5 quotes from mixed sources: [Interview], [Review], [Support]
Focus on:
  • Payment friction points
  • Cart abandonment reasons
  • Mobile UX issues
  • Where do interviews align with or explain channel feedback patterns?
Write for product and engineering teams.

Frequently Asked Questions

Most reports will generate in seconds to a few minutes. Timing depends on the scope of the data (project vs. folder vs. channel), the complexity of your prompt, and whether you are asking for deeper synthesis (more themes, more quotes, more structure). If a report is taking longer than expected, narrowing the timeframe or focusing on a specific theme/segment can help.
Anyone with edit-level access to the relevant data can create reports in Docs. Just like the rest of Dovetail, Managers and Contributors can create and edit, while view-only users can view and comment.